M037. Reports and Suggestions | Table of Contents | |||||||
Ref Number: | ||||||||
|
|
In my Report from that place, I find the following remarks on the general subject which I will beg to quote:—
And on a general review of this journey through the Bay of Plenty and Waikato districts, I had to report of the Natives thus:—
At Tauranga, as in other places, I could not observe the extreme inconvenience of having two different systems—the Maori and the English—at work, at the same time; for neither party will submit to the other, and all are thrown into confusion. And as the Natives plead, on Government authority, that they can either accept our English system or reject it, as they think proper, so it is merely a matter of interest or convenience with them as to whether they submit to our jurisdiction or not. In such a state of affairs, the total inefficiency of any system whatever is fully manifest. It seems desirable either that our own plans (whatever they may be) should be carried out, in all their integrity, or that the Natives should be left to themselves,—an alternative destructive to their own interests. At Maketu, there were but few Natives, and no runanga; our Assessor, Tohi te Ururangi, managing everything in his own person. Besides which, all the people seemed under the personal influence of the Rev. Mr. Chapman, who exercised a paternal authority over them. At Otamarakau, until break of day, the talk was all about the runanga ; and at Matata it was found flourishing with great authority. At Whakatane, they suspended its operations until after they had done fighting about the land. This broil originated in a slight quarrel about the site for a mill, and was said to be beyond the power of runanga, or Government influence, or anything but the force of arms, to decide: and so they were left to finish it, having lost seven on one side (Ngatiawa) and fifteen on the other (Ngatipukeko). At Ohiwa they had certainly gone stark mad on the subject. One man was fined a foal for carrying a pistol with him on the beach. Another was fined £5 for stating his opinion that the runanga of the place had in a certain instance acted improperly. Indeed the runangas are as bad as the Star Chamber, for not allowing their acts to be evil spoken of. I have heard of their going about the houses, eaves-dropping, and afterwards citing the husband or wife before the Council for some tart remark or reply which one of them had used to others; and then when both parties naturally joined forces, and complained of the inquisitoral character of the runanga, the latter body has fallen back on its dignity, and fined each of them severely for contempt of Court. In another case, a man was fined 10s, for properly correcting his own child, It is from this kind of thraldom and perpetual interference, that so many of the middle and lower classes of Maories, would, I believe, delight to be liberated. Another man, at Ohiwa, was informed by his wife that a youth of the village had taken tile liberty of tickling her on the arm ; on which he instantly called the runanga, and demanded £150 damages. Not having many friends on the bench, he lost his case, which he then removed to Opotiki, whose Council adjudged him £20, and the offence was at last compounded for by the present of a young horse. Now, considering that nearly all temptation to irregular behaviour, in the Maori society, proceeds in the first instance from the woman and not from the man, it will be seen what a lucrative investment can be made by inter-marrying with a Maori coquette who will be artful enough to inveigle others, without committing herself or husband. In this way much money and property changes hands in New Zealand. I recollect one of the Waitara people being fined £200 for adultery with one of the women of the Puketapu, and this large sum was collected and paid by the tribe. Immediately after this, the tables were turned, and one of the Puketapus was found convicted of a similar offence with one of the chief married woman of Waitara. Expecting to meet with equal promptitude, as from themselves, they laid the damages at £300, hoping to clear £100 by the transaction, for such it was in every sense of the word. For I was credibly informed, that it was a mere intrigue between the young chief and his wife (never very chaste), that she should so prostitute herself, as not only to bring back to the tribe the original fine, but half as much again, by way of interest. At my suggestion, the £200 were re-paid to the Atiawas, and a full stop put to all further prosecutions for criminal convictions of so outrageous a character. But for that, we should shortly not have had a virtuous woman in the district. |